View Single Post
  #3  
Old October 16th 03, 10:47 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Gardner" writes:

When I was an examiner, I would have expected you to fly the approach
profile as published. Once upon a time I decided to forego the "descent and
maintain 2200 feet" on the way in to BFI's ILS 13R, thinking that I would
stay at 3000 and intercept the glideslope high....got chided by Seattle
Approach for doing so.


But in that case, if I understand correctly, you had a specific
instruction from ATC to descend to 2200 -- that's different from
step-down altitudes in a published IAP.


All the best,


David