I did read the entire definition...

You are simply restating what I said.

But let's just let it drop, shall we?


"T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message
...
"Lakeview Bill" wrote:

You stated:

"The LSA definition stands alone. Any aircraft that meets that deviation
can be flown by a SP who has the right signoffs."

That is not correct.

Yes it is.

As I previously noted, a type-certified aircraft that would have met the
LSA
specs in its original configuration, but has been modified to a point
where
it would not meet those specs, would not be flyable as an LSA even if the
modifications were removed and the aircraft was rolled-back to it's
original
specs.

That's true, but you are ignoring the first part of the
definition that says it's an LSA only if it has continuously
met the weight/speed limits since it's "original
certification." If the plane did not meet those limits
continuously, then it does not meet the definition that
requires that. You have to read the entire definition.



T o d d P a t t i s t
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)
___
Make a commitment to learn something from every flight.
Share what you learn.