Thread: EPA update
View Single Post
  #4  
Old August 31st 05, 02:01 AM
ORVAL FAIRAIRN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article
outaviation.com,
"Skylune" wet the bed, took a bite of
skunk cabbage and gloated:

Well, I did hear back from the EPA concerning a local GA airport's efforts
to get an exemption from regulations concerning fuel storage. You see,
one of my most annoying local airports sits atop an important aquifer that
supplies the whole region with groundwater. The local FBO's (who control
the airport board) want a certain regulation concerning fuel storage
voided so that they don't have to pay the cost of constructing a storage
area (and probably because they want to put hangars there, to generate
more profit).

Anyway, the EPA was already on to it. Their response was encouraging.
Here it is (with some minor blackouts -- don't want the poor EPA person to
receive threats from some of the whacko pilots, you know, so I blacked out
a few words...)

(snip)

Nice job Senator. But I wrote that Senator at the same time, as well as
my other US Senator, Congressman, and state reps urging them to NOT relax
any EPA regulations for the financial benefit of the FBOs.


Now, all they have to do is put some retroactive birth control pill into
"Skylune's" water supply! This guy is a real horse's ass!