View Single Post
  #6  
Old October 4th 05, 12:44 PM
Mark T. Dame
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cub Driver wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0400, "Mark T. Dame"
wrote:


In my case, we started working on landings the very first lesson. My
third lesson was focused completely on skills needed for landing
(stalls, simulated pattern over a corn field, and actual landings
including a go-around). By five hours I was doing touch & go's.


This is a very high standard for a newbie. I think it would be better
to tell him/her about the guy who spent a thousand dollars learning
how to taxi the airplane, 50 hours to solo, 100 hours to check flight.
Then, when he/she beats the benchmark, he/she will feel very chuffed.


(-:

My point has nothing to do with skill (or lack thereof), just that four
hours isn't too early to start learning how to land. And I had a very
conservative instructor. He didn't start teaching me how to land on my
first lesson because I was some kind of natural. Far from it. He
started teaching how to land on the first lesson because landing is the
most important part of the flight.


-m
--
## Mark T. Dame
## VP, Product Development
## MFM Software, Inc. (http://www.mfm.com/)
"I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead."