Greg Farris wrote:

Not so sure about that, in this day and age. What about the pilot recently,
just back from Bible Camp or whatever, who decided to turn his 767 into a
preaching forum? Granted this would again be a question of challenging and
existing ATP - but what if a Scientologist applicant shows up, announcing his
intention to capitalize on his 200-member strong captive audience? You'd think
he wouldn't be stupid enough to admit to such an intention, but if he did,
or it came to be known, shouldn't there be some regulatory clause to honor the
fact that safe operation of the aircraft is not first and foremost in this
individual's mind . . .

I think we can count on the industry to deny people like that a second audience.
No need for the government to get involved and an excellent argument that the
Constitution forbids such a regulation.

George Patterson
Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor.
It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him.