Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Barry said:
When doing an ILS approach, with the glideslope, is it a requirement to
be
able to identify the outer marker or a substitute? FAR 91.175(k) lists
the

"or a substitute" is the operative phrase. If the FAF is identified by an
intersection, LOM, or DME, that's an acceptable substitute for a locator
beacon.

The FAF on an ILS is glideslope intersect, not the LOM, DME etc which are
not required.

HIlton