Is this the same group that did the Di-hidrogen Oxide study? Or the one
that found that saliva is deadly when consumed at small doses over long
enough periods of time?

Any claim, study, or proof that X impacts Y is meaningless unless some
quantitative relationship is shown: just how much of X does just how
much impact to Y.

The study may have had this quantitative data, but the post didn't.
Therefore it cannot be concluded from the post that the impact is
relevant. Assuming it was a good study (and did have the data), the
omission of this information from the post is evidence that the impact
is =not= relevant, but the poster does not want to give that away since
it undermines the alarm the poster would otherwise create.

Therefore, I dismiss it totally.

Jose
--
Money: what you need when you run out of brains.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.