"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
God, I HOPE not! IMHO, a BRS is more liability than asset, with
recurring (expensive maintenance, the ongoing hazard of pyrotechnics,
etc.

Apparently it's been very good for the aircraft's public perception of
safety. Also, there are more than a handful of pilots that have used the
chute "in anger" who will beg to differ with you.

From a marketing perspective, incorporating the BRS system will seriously
curtail Cirrus' differentiation strategy.

Marco Leon





Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com