"John T" wrote in message m...
Jose wrote:

Actually, I'm not convinced that the proposal for a permanent ADIZ is
triggered by or even supported by this incident.

I am. Soon after this incident (and directly due to it) members of Congress from both parties introduced legislation
to strengthen penalties for ADIZ violations. Not long after that (in bureaucratic terms), the FAA proposed to make
the ADIZ permanent. I'm sure the fact that as of May 12, 2005 there were 1,682 ADIZ violations had something to do
with it, too.

....snip...
John T
http://sage1solutions.com/TknoFlyer
http://pocketgear.com/products_searc...veloperid=4415
____________________




The NPRM for permanently making this airspace restricted is the FAAs way to calling the TSA or Homeland Security to the
table; when this airspace was defined, the TSA (or Homeland Security, or SS) was supposed to justify it every 60 days or
so which has never been done. This NPRM requires public hearings so they will have to try and justify it which should
prove to be interesting....