
April 17th 04, 05:12 PM
|
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Barry" wrote in message
...
Here's a real-world scenario that I've encountered:
VOR 22 approach to GED (Georgetown, DE):
http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/publis...s/00935V22.PDF
Coming from the northeast, on the 057 radial inbound to ATR (Victor
308),
Dover Approach says "cross Waterloo at 3000, cleared for the VOR 22
approach".
Since my course is now 237, I'm only three degrees off the final
approach
course of 234. There's no "No PT" sector shown, and the charted hold in
lieu
of a PT would put me on the 033 radial, with a 23 degree turn at the
FAF.
Obviously it makes no sense to do a turn in the hold, and Dover didn't
expect
me to, but some people would claim it's required. Is Dover doing
anything
contrary to 7110.65?
Nope.
So are you saying the turn around the hold is not legally required here?
Why not?
Thanks,
John Clonts
Temple, Texas
N7NZ
|