"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
Stan Gosnell me@work wrote:
It appears to me that they made a mistake on the GPS Rwy 16 by
not making radar required.

OK, that makes sense.

There is no way to fly the approach
if you're coming from the south, since it's marked PT NA.

My first reaction was "What do you mean it's marked PT NA?". Then I saw
the notation on the vertical profile view. There's no "NoPT" on the
plan view. Another charting error?

Hmm, the 34 doesn't have either NoPT on the plan view or PT NA on the
profile. I guess that also makes sense since the only way to fly it on
vectors.


There is no PT identified on the chart so it needs no "NoPT" to tell you not
to PT. The NoPT is (I think) only shown on segments of an approach that
have PTs (the approach has PT) but where some IAF do not require a PT and
some do.

As for the Radar required - check the 2 NM and 1.1 NM points on the chart -
it looks like they have it there for that? (Though I suppose your GPS might
be able to tell you that but it probably is not a waypoint).

I just did some hunting around, and it looks like NACO takes chart
corrections via email, . I guess I'll drop them
a line and see what they say.