Actually 122.75 would be a better choice.


"Jim Macklin" wrote
in message news:9okJf.395621$0l5.191086@dukeread06...
| http://www.fly-ul.com/navfreq.html
|
|
| Not all usable frequencies are listed on a chart. The
| question was for air to air, general communications not
ATC.
| AFD lists all the ATC frequencies assigned, but the AIM
| lists other frequency assignments.
|
|
| --
| James H. Macklin
| ATP,CFI,A&P
|
| --
| The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
| But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
| some support
| http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
| See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and
duties.
|
|
|
|
| "Travis Marlatte" wrote
in
| message
|
hlink.net...
|| Maybe it's because I've done all my training here plus I
| probably have that
|| Chicago state of mind but I don't find them all that bad.
| I have a lot more
|| trouble with Milwaukee. Of course, if they are busy,
| forget about it.
||
|| Why did Jim suggest 122.9? I just checked the Chicago
| Terminal chart and
|| don't see it listed there. I think contacting Chicago App
| is the official
|| way to go.
||
|| Midway is very helpful and they are watching the same
| radar as O'Hare but
|| their world is pretty boxed in. If you feel nervous,
| your're on the south
|| side of Chicago, and Chicago App is too scarey, go for
| Midway.
||
|| If I am flying around the Class B, I usually monitor the
| appropriate Chicago
|| App frequency. If I hear them call me out as an
unverified
| VFR traffic, then
|| I'll call up. Of course, there could be twenty other guys
| monitoring and
|| motoring along.
||
|| --
|| -------------------------------
|| Travis
|| "Ron Natalie" wrote in message
|| m...
|| Nathan Young wrote:
|| On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:10:50 -0600, "Marty"
|
|| wrote:
||
|| A question to all you IL.guys.
||
|| How has flying down the Chi.lakefront changed since
| 9/11?
||
|| Now that Meigs is gone - we no longer have to talk to
| anyone, although
|| because of traffic, it is always a good idea to get
| flight following
|| from Approach.
|| I actually found Chicago approach to be difficult and
| useless. Gary
|| provides decent advisories on their BRITE until you get
| too far
|| from them. I've dealt with approach controls all up
| and down
|| the east coast and as far west as Denver, but Chicago
is
| the
|| most difficult to deal with VFR.
||
||
|
|