"khobar" wrote in
news:apTKf.4201$Sp2.2506@fed1read02:


"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Thank you for all the responses. It's nice to get other opinions.
There's a few things that weren't commented on though.

For instance.....

"In the case of a Boeing 757 or 767, the pilot would be faced with an
EFIS (Electronic Flight Instrumentation System) panel comprised of
six large multi-mode LCDs interspersed with clusters of assorted
"hard" instruments. These displays process the raw aircraft system
and flight data into an integrated picture of the aircraft situation,
position and progress, not only in horizontal and vertical
dimensions, but also with regard to time and speed as well. When
flying "blind", I.e., with no ground reference cues, it takes a
highly skilled pilot to interpret, and then apply, this data
intelligently. If one cannot translate this information quickly,
precisely and accurately (and it takes an instrument-rated pilot to
do so), one would have ZERO SITUATIONAL AWARENESS. I.e., the pilot
wouldn't have a clue where s/he was in relation to the earth. Flight
under such conditions is referred to as "IFR", or Instrument Flight
Rules."


"According to FAA radar controllers, "Flight 77" then suddenly pops
up over Washington DC and executes an incredibly precise diving turn
at a rate of 360 degrees/minute while descending at 3,500 ft/min, at
the end of which "Hanjour" allegedly levels out at ground level. Oh,
I almost forgot: He also had the presence of mind to turn off the
transponder in the middle of this incredibly difficult maneuver (one
of his instructors later commented the hapless fellow couldn't have
spelt the word if his life depended on it)."

"The maneuver was in fact so precisely executed that the air traffic
controllers at Dulles refused to believe the blip on their screen was
a commercial airliner. Danielle O'Brian, one of the air traffic
controllers at Dulles who reported seeing the aircraft at 9:25 said,
"The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all
thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic
controllers, that that was a military plane.""

"And then, all of a sudden we have magic. Voila! Hanjour finds the
Pentagon sitting squarely in his sights right before him."

"But even that wasn't good enough for this fanatic Muslim kamikaze
pilot. You see, he found that his "missile" was heading towards one
of the most densely populated wings of the Pentagon-and one occupied
by top military brass, including the Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld.
Presumably in order to save these men's lives, he then executes a
sweeping 270-degree turn and approaches the building from the
opposite direction and aligns himself with the only wing of the
Pentagon that was virtually uninhabited due to extensive renovations
that were underway (there were some 120 civilians construction
workers in that wing who were killed; their work included
blast-proofing the outside wall of that wing)."

"I shan't get into the aerodynamic impossibility of flying a large
commercial jetliner 20 feet above the ground at over 400 MPH. A
discussion on ground effect energy, tip vortex compression, downwash
sheet reaction, wake turbulence, and jetblast effects are beyond the
scope of this article (the 100,000-lb jetblast alone would have blown
whole semi-trucks off the roads.)

"Let it suffice to say that it is physically impossible to fly a
200,000- lb airliner 20 feet above the ground at 400 MPH."




According to the article, the alledged hijackers would have had to be
trained instrument pilots, and thoroughly familiar with the 757/767
six large screen LCD display in order to pilot the aircraft.

As the article states,

"When flying "blind", I.e., with no ground reference cues, it takes a
highly skilled pilot to interpret, and then apply, this data
intelligently. If one cannot translate this information quickly,
precisely and accurately (and it takes an instrument-rated pilot to
do so), one would have ZERO SITUATIONAL AWARENESS. I.e., the pilot
wouldn't have a clue where s/he was in relation to the earth. Flight
under such conditions is referred to as "IFR", or Instrument Flight
Rules."

At no time were any of the aircraft flying blind, thus the established
facts as to what happened that day are completely consistent with what
the article claims. Oops.

Paul Nixon



The government's version of 9/11 is not established fact... not to those
who can read between the lines