TRUTH wrote:
Jones does not need to be a building engineer. He's a physicist and is
therefore qualified to determine if the government's version defies
physics.

So? I have a physics degree too.

Why do you listen to Jones and not the people with physics and engineering
degrees who wrote the reports that contradict Jones' theory? If you were
really objective, you'd consider their analysis too. You'd quote from them
equally and contrast the explanations yourself. But my guess is that you
don't have the technical background to do that, so you are using subjective
criteria that leads you to unfounded beliefs.