Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONSon 9/11
Well they do connect to the question of his credibility.
TRUTH wrote:
Those facta have no bearing on this at all.
The government verion of the WTC collapses defy physics.
The idea that the Towers could collapse at near free fall speed from fire
is absurd.
How did the 47 MASSIVE STEEL COLUMNS in the Towers severe? And HOW did
they ALL severe at the SAME TIME?
"Frank F. Matthews" wrote in
:
You should mention that he is primarily an expert in Cold Fusion &
Christ's visit to America. He is neither an expert on materials or
demolition.
TRUTH wrote:
Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to
hundreds of people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the
government's version of events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar
can be viewed on Google Video, or downloaded to your computer.
The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:
"I presented my objections to the “official” theory at a seminar at
BYU on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed
evidence and scientific arguments for the controlled demolition
theory. In attendance were faculty from Physics, Mechanical
Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Psychology,
Geology, and Mathematics – and perhaps other departments as I did not
recognize all of the people present. A local university and college
were represented (BYU and Utah Valley State College).
The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended
only when a university class needed the room. After presenting the
material summarized here, including actually looking at and
discussing the collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee
disagreed (by hand- vote) that further investigation of the WTC
collapses was called for. The next day, the dissenting professor
said he had further thought about it and now agreed that more
investigation was needed."
Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding
are based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.
In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin
foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his
scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed
like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are
pathetic.
You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to
9/11.
The airplanes were flown by remote control. The events were for the
purpose of building public support to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.
Some of you will still deny this fact. If so, it will be because your
thinking process is too much filled with tin foil hat commments, and
you're too stupid and brainwashed to understand real evidence
|