I find it very interesting how no one is countering any of the real
evidence. Everyone must be afraid, since they know they can't. They just
stick with the more easily debunkable material, and they claimed they
debunked everything.

You think you know about 9/11? Then debunk Jones' 17 reasons. You think you
have the slightest clue about what happened on 9/11? Prove it!


From Jones' paper:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Seventeen reasons for advancing the controlled-demolition hypothesis while
challenging the “official” fire-caused collapse hypothesis are delineated
here. (No rebuttal can be complete, of course, unless it addresses all of
these points.)"