February 23rd 06, 04:45 PM
posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
|
|
|
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11
Dan wrote in news:IllLf.23582$Ug4.1739@dukeread12:
TRUTH wrote:
I find it very interesting how no one is countering any of the real
evidence. Everyone must be afraid, since they know they can't. They
just stick with the more easily debunkable material, and they claimed
they debunked everything.
You think you know about 9/11? Then debunk Jones' 17 reasons. You
think you have the slightest clue about what happened on 9/11? Prove
it!
From Jones' paper:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
"Seventeen reasons for advancing the controlled-demolition hypothesis
while challenging the “official” fire-caused collapse hypothesis are
delineated here. (No rebuttal can be complete, of course, unless it
addresses all of these points.)"
Again you bring this "peer reviewed paper" up as if you wave it
often
enough it becomes the truth. It has been debunked here and by faculty
in his own school. Keep trying, I bet you will find tens of people
world wide who will believe you.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
This is the 3rd time I'm asking you: point me to the thread and I will
read it
|