TRUTH wrote:

"Matt Wright" wrote in
oups.com:

Another poster provided FAA records showing that Mohammed Atta was
both commercial and instrument rated - hardly a "clueless non-pilot".
Flight instructors maybe had poor overall opinions of the pilots, but
you don't know how long they trained away from the flight school. You
don't know how much "book time" they had studying avionics. The
attack had years of planning behind it. I guess they could have spent
that time playing pinball... but maybe instead they were studying.
That something is hard does not make it impossible.

Matt.

I missed that. Please post it. Still, showing one of them was instrument
trained does not explain the others

How many times do you need to have it explained to you that there was no
need for any of them to be instrument trained ? Flying in clear skies does
not require an instrument rating.

Graham