"khobar" wrote in
news:C6yLf.4487$Sp2.232@fed1read02:

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
"Scott M. Kozel" wrote in
:

TRUTH wrote:

I do not have a physics/engineering degree, but do have a
technical background, and definitely have an abundance of common
sense.

You have NO common sense.




You believe a 757 hit the Pentagon when there's no evidence, you must
be talking about yourself.

Not one person has provided proof!

You provided proof in one of your cites.

From: http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html

The Pentagon attack:
the "no plane" theories discredit 9/11 skepticism and distract from
proven evidence of complicity

a.. there is zero evidence for any of the "no plane" claims -
hundreds of
people saw the plane, none saw a cruise missile, Global Hawk robot
plane, smaller plane or flying saucer piloted by giant lizards
b.. the physical evidence shows that a large twin engine jet hit the
nearly empty part of the Pentagon, the "Black Boxes" were found,
cleanup crews found remains of the passengers, the "hole was too
small" claim was a hoax.

LOL.

Paul Nixon





Okay, I understand now. There are so many unknows and opinions that not
every website will give exact same information. One just needs to look at
it, and consider which information is most important. Please post future
replies in the new thread