View Single Post
  #78  
Old February 25th 06, 08:07 PM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONSon 9/11



TRUTH wrote:

Dan wrote in news:wTCLf.26212$Ug4.11880@dukeread12:


Frank F. Matthews wrote:


TRUTH wrote:

Dan wrote in news:jbqLf.24058$Ug4.15324@dukeread12:



Thomas Borchert wrote:


Truth,



that explain ANY of the clear scientific envidence provided.


It's not peer reviewed. So let's just assume it's not science,
either, until proven otherwise by the peer review. Which is exactly
the purpose of peer review.


Actually real engineers in Jones' own school have debunked it.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired






Yeah, where? Point out the specific URL?

They should bother creating a URL just to debunk you?


Especially since other people have presented same showing where the
engineers at BYU very diplomatically called Jones a liar. Truth refuses
to believe it so it didn't happen.

It has been established truth:

1) knows nothing about science or the scientific method - he has said


so

2) knows nothing about math - he has said so and proved as much
3) knows nothing about being a pilot - he has proved this
4) knows nothing about metallurgy - he can't accept hot metal can fail
5) knows nothing about demolition - "squib" is a "puff of smoke"
6) changes the questions after he asks them and misuses the responses
7) asks for responses from engineers and pilots then calls them liars
8) thinks name calling is a proper method of argument
9) etc

and yet tells us WE don't understand or have open minds.

I have come to the conclusion he either is that dense or he is just
yanking our collective chains.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired





I've explained the reasons why the strucural engineering department at
BYU does not (publicly) believe Jones. There are scared for their lives.
Perhaps their afraid of an anthrax letter. (Afterall, anthrax letters
were mailed to two senators who opposed the Patriot Act.)

But, BYU's strucural engineering department's disaagreement with Jones is
not the same as debunking the paper.


(Dan, if you respond to this message, please do so in the other thread.
There's too many posts to keep track of in all these threads. And yes, I
know it's my fault for creating them.)



Boy. Now all the experts who disagree with your non expert are simply
afraid for their lives. Please. And you promised to leave us alone and
go away to your new thread.