"Richard Isakson" wrote in
:

wrote ...
Take a look at some of the papers on the site -

http://www.winggrid.ch/AIAA-2004-2120.pdf
http://www.winggrid.ch/AIAA-2004-2120.pdf

Since they aren't selling anything, and they are doing both real world
experiments and academic papers with plenty of data collection, I
wouldn't call them snake oil.

Snake oil is far too nice a term for what they're peddling. Did you
read the paper? In the first sentence they throw out a hundred years of
aerodynamics and replace it with their own. Why? Because the old stuff
doesn't give the answers they want.

This Doonesbury is appropriate:

http://www.uclick.com/client/wpc/db/.../05/index.html

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?