Are you saying most of the articles posted to rec.aviation.piloting
contain no information? If true, then this newsgroup would be more
like an electronic bulletin board than a member of the Usenet
hierarchy.

I have not done a statistical survey, however quite a few articles are
"information challenged". And some of the articles which have
garnered the most positive responses are not informational in nature -
they concern personal experiences. Granted that personal experiences
contain information, so would the personal experiences of the OP wrt his
A+++ place.

Actually it's Spam (not spam).

Touché.

Please be aware that spam is not defined as a commercial solicitation.
Such commercial announcements and solicitations are considered
on-topic if:

* They contain information

Doesn't every commercial solicitation? That's like asking how one can do
an approach or hold without "intercepting and tracking".

That said, of course it would have been more effective if he had
chosen to share more details of his personal experience

.... which is what I was proposing.

Jose
--
Money: what you need when you run out of brains.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.