View Single Post
  #3  
Old March 16th 06, 01:03 AM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default If WTC 7 came down from fire and debris ..

" wrote in
oups.com:

TRUTH wrote:
then why did the leaseholder say....


"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander,
telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain
the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe
the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to
pull and we watched the building collapse


Because he had decide to abandon any attempt to preserve the
building and was willing to pull any efforts to do so.



"Pull" is an industry term that means professionally demolish, as is
confirmed by this clip from the same PBS documentary:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/vide.../pull_wtc6.wmv





http://www.911blogger.com/files/video/wtc7_pbs.WMV

WTC 7, a 47 story steel framed building built in 1987, collapsed
completely, near freefall speed.


That's how they tend to collapse.



When taken down by pre-positioned explosives.




WTC 7 housed the Secret Service's LARGEST field office
http://www.g4tv.com/techtvvault/feat...the_Secret_Ser
vice. html

Would the SS have an office in a building that could collapse like
that?


Yes. They aren't civil engineers ya know. I'd bet several dollars
that
none of the occupants knew of the Rubegoldberg foundation structure
that building sat upon.