The AIM is NOT regulatory nor official legal doctrine. The
AIM seems to be logical and reasonable, but I think there
needs to be an official FAA legal opinion stated.



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Jose" wrote in message
. ..
| The current AIM (7-1-23) explicitly states that "forecast
icing conditions"
| are *not* "known icing conditions":
|
| Has there been a case yet where the FAA has agreed with
this definition
| in an enforcement action?
|
| Jose
| --
| Nothing takes longer than a shortcut.
| for Email, make the obvious change in the address.