PSRU design advantages
Richard Lamb wrote:
ADK wrote:
IF you had to design a PSRU, to drive a pusher propellor via shaft,
what would your experience dictate? Thinking along the lines of a
gearbelt, chain or gear. Please, I would appreciate the collective
experience available on this group. I have decided on the aircraft,
but want to make it the most reliable and safest it can be.
"ADK" wrote in message
news:X6TXf.28774$%H.11944@clgrps13...
This is probably going to open old wounds. What I would like is
experienced input on the advantages, for economic, efficiency and
longevity etc. of different types of redrives.
I am leaning towards a cog-belt reducer in a 6 cylinder, liquid
cooled, configuration driving a long drive shaft to the prop.
The collective experience is zilch = nada = squat = undefined.
THAT is what everybody had been trying to tell you.
Wait a second. Look around the airport.
How many shaft driven propellers do you see?
Have you ever seen?
If you are heart set on doing it, I sincerely wish you luck.
But I can't offer any further advice - 'cuz they ain't none...
Richard
Richard,
Didn't the military do this once?? Seems there was the P-39 Aircobra,
shaft driven from a rear mounted engine?? Are the gray cells working
that far back??
Not that it would be applicable to an experimental, but at least It was
once done?
George
|