"Bob O'Rilley" wrote in message
...

" Considering that Lycoming and Continental have BILLIONS (TRILLIONS ?? )
of
hours flying, it's not surprising that they've killed more pilots. What's
also amusing is people that can't correlate data but shoot their mouth
off anyway.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO

Oh yes... thank you, I see now, your data is much more precise than mine
(BILLIONS and TRILLIONS). Oh, hang on! you have no data either. Perhaps
you should correlate some data and then proceed to shoot your mouth off.

Thanks you for aptly demonstrating you have no clue what you're blabbering
about.


While we are on the subject, Morgans advised that two LSA aircraft with
Rotax engines crashed after engine failures and even though they were
probably the ultralight two stroke Rotax engines, he will never fly any
LSA at all and particularly with any Rotax engine including the ultra
reliable four stroke 912 or the unrelated Jabiru engine. There is simply
no comparison between a two stroke Rotax a four stroke Rotax and a Jabiru,
please, are we really that stupid to bundle all LSA aircraft and engines
into one basket because of two crashes?

By the way, a friend of mine was flying a Russian utility plane with an
M14P radial engine when it threw a rod/piston and the engine failed. As a
result, you will not find me flying an all metal GA aircraft, particularly
Cessna's and Pipers with piston engines made by Lycomming or Continental!

Bob.

Bob = Clueless