What about Klyde Morris?
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
		
 
Kyle Boatright wrote: 
 
 
 I remember that there was a suit, but not what it was about... A quick 
 google search didn't seem to get me anywhere either. 
 
 Will someone step in and refresh my memory cells? 
 
 KB 
 
September 16-17 -- Free speech & web litigation: AVweb capitulates to 
defamation suit.  Which reminds us of an update we should have posted 
earlier: readers will recall the defamation lawsuits filed last year by 
aviation plaintiff's attorney Arthur Alan Wolk against two editors and 
four subscribers of the aviation-news website AVweb, all of whom had 
sharply criticized him after he won a $480 million verdict against 
Cessna (Sept. 7 and Oct. 12-14, 2001).  On July 19 the website rendered 
to Wolk a thoroughly abject capitulation and apology in connection with 
his agreement to drop his suit against it.  Its statement to readers 
(link now dead) includes a number of passages which deserve to be read 
with great care by those to whom the Internet still represents some 
sort of idealized sanctuary for untrammeled discussion [italicized 
comments ours]: 
"One of Mr. Wolk's complaints was that we did not supervise our chat 
room to prevent libelous comments about him being published by our 
subscribers.  We have corrected that.  Another of Mr. Wolk's complaints 
was that our characterizations instigated some of our subscribers to 
libel him.  We will no longer characterize matters in such a way as to 
bring apparent discredit upon anyone." [The consequences of such a 
formula for the future of hard-hitting journalism can be imagined.  And 
the mind reels at what is involved in the task of avoiding all 
characterizations which, whether or not libelous themselves, might 
instigate others to commit that offense. -- ed.] 
 
"While the defense of Mr. Wolk's lawsuit has been expensive, he 
nonetheless has been gracious enough to settle with us for a payment to 
charity.  In fact, even in settlement negotiations, when there was a 
demand for money, it was always to be contributed to charity, none for 
Mr. Wolk himself.  He steadfastly insisted that his lawsuit was not 
about money and we have come to believe him."  [Why would it be thought 
surprising that the aim of such a lawsuit might be more to silence 
certain critics than to obtain cash from them? -- ed.] 
 
As we say, read the whole thing, which lays out at considerable length 
Mr. Wolk's reasons for considering himself libeled.  AVweb then goes on 
to publish a sort of protracted advertisement for Mr. Wolk's services, 
in the form of tributes and testimonials from grateful clients he has 
represented in litigation, as well as others.  Also included is the 
painfully self-abasing apology of one of the reader-posters who found 
himself individually sued by the powerful lawyer -- outgunned in every 
way, and facing who knows what sort of prolonged personal exposure to 
the cost of litigation.  Among the lessons many observers will draw, we 
think, will be the old one: watch what you say about lawyers. 
(DURABLE LINK) 
 
 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
			
 
			
			
			
				 
            
			
			
            
            
                
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 |