Thread
:
Moving a C172 to Australia from California
View Single Post
#
2
June 5th 06, 07:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
tony roberts
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
Moving a C172 to Australia from California
Totally different angle to consider and investigate:
If you import it as a new resident you can probably take it in tax free.
If you buy one there, and if planes are treated anything like cars are
there, the tax bill will be considerable. (My brother bought a 6 year
old Explorer in Oz for the same price as I paid new in Canada)
You can probably ship for what you would pay there in tax alone on a
similar a/c.
HTH
--
Tony Roberts
PP-ASEL
VFR OTT
Night
Cessna 172H C-GICE
In article .com,
"argon39" wrote:
After 30 years of fun and excitement in the SF Bay area, I've taken a
new job in Perth, Western Australia. Now I need to decide what to do
about my iBugsmasher, a wonderful 1969 C172K that I have modified so
that it's just the way I want it:
C172K, 2050 hours on airframe
New Garmin IFR panel
100 hours on O-360 180 HP conversion
Hartzell constant speed prop
Horton STOL kit
Powerflow tuned exhaust
As I see it, there are three options.
[1] Sell the precious iBugsmasher and buy a new airplane in Australia.
[2] Ferry it. (The first 2100 NM leg to Hawaii is kinda long without an
autopilot!).
[3] Take the wings off, crate it up and ship it.
Pros and cons for each option:
[1] Easiest, but I have the a/c just as I want it except for paint and
interior (that was going to happen later). The Australian market is
much smaller and it would probably take some time to find the 'right'
airplane. And it's probably more expensive, but I really don't know
yet.
[2] While parts of the trans-Pac adventure would be worth writing
about, I'm not interested in tanking the a/c and flying it myself.
There might be a ferry company willing to do this, but the costs
involved will not be trivial. With an STC it might just be possible to
put a bladder in the a/c that could get it to Hawaii for the long leg.
But there is still a long way to go after that.
[3] This option seems the most sane, but there are major
disassembly/reassembly costs and after that there are additional costs
of inspection and certification by the Australian authorities.
I'd really appreciate hearing from folks who have some experience in
this area. Which of the options (or one I haven't thought of yet) are
reasonable and/or practical?
Thanks.
argon39
tony roberts
View message headers