Because he blames his training instead of admitting, he should have
never been unable to salvage 350 ft on final with functional airbrakes.
He should admit the high drag landing approach is not conservative by
any stretch of anyone's imagination and should not be used or required
on a 6,000 FOOT RUNWAY if one knows how to use the spoilers and slip.


MS


wrote:
Why are so many slamming the author of the articles ? He has already
acknowledged the compounded errors which led to the crash ? The point
of the two excellent articles ( better than many previously published
in Soaring ), and in first person no less, as opposed to
reconstructions in the equally important section "Safety Corner", is to
alert other pilots to what can go wrong, NOT to excuse or rationalize a
series of wrong decisions. IMHO, any article pertaining to an accident
or almost-accident is worthwhile. The vociferous personal attacks
against the pilot , even more so those against his instructor, are
entirely uncalled for.

Cheers anyhow, Charles