View Single Post
  #25  
Old July 27th 06, 08:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Ken Finney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 190
Default Wondering What Light Sport Can Do For You?


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message
...
[...]
You might read the Exemption as saying that the reasoning
behind granting it applies only to the specific design of
the Mermaid:

"The FAA finds the structural integrity of the Mermaid
aircraft is enhanced by its "flying boat" design. This
design offers increased protection for the occupants in
event of landing with improperly positioned landing gear. "


Interesting.

The finding of "structural integrity" would apply to any amphibian,
boat-hull or float-equipped. It's almost as though the FAA was not at all
concerned about gear-down water landings, but rather gear-up land
landings, and that it's really just the prohibition against retractable
gear as it relates to the usual landplane retractable gear issues that
they were focused on.

If so, I take back what I said about the FAA's thinking making sense. As
an owner of an amphib myself, I suppose I might have jumped to conclusions
and given the FAA the benefit of the doubt, thinking that they correctly
identified gear-down water landings as a significant safety risk that LSA
ought to avoid (gear-up on land is usually just expensive, gear-down on
water is often fatal and at a minimum almost always involves injuries).
But based on a reading of the text you've quoted, it seems they might have
foolishly just been worried about gear-up landings on land and don't
really care about the water-flying issues.

It will be interesting to see if they extend this waiver from the "no
retractable gear" rule for all amphibious LSA aircraft. If so, then they
are just being foolishly inconsistent, as usual.

Pete


OK, the scoop I've been told SEVERAL times by the EAA is that the FAA
screwed up, and was "shocked" to see how the final wording read. But, being
a bureacracy, you can't ever admit to being wrong, so they had to come up
with words to solve the immediate problem, and words to solve the permanent
problem, all without admitting a mistake in the first place. When viewed in
that light, the Exemption wording makes a lot of sense.