View Single Post
  #5  
Old August 2nd 06, 01:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 407
Default Rec.Aviation OSH report


"Ron Wanttaja" wrote

Don't know why it would make a difference, tax-wise.

My guess is that it's a combination of factors. "Prototype" implies it is

the
first aircraft of a series of aircraft, and Cessna may not yet have Board

of
Directors' approval to start production.

Also, if major changes have to be made (such as a switch to another

engine), the
"spin control" is easier with a "Proof of Concept." Big changes between

the
"Prototype" and the production aircraft implies some faulty decisions

during the
design process, but if you call it a "Proof of Concept" you can just

claim,
"Well, we were just trying different ideas, pushing the envelope, that

sort of
thing." Then you build a "prototype" that closely matches the production

model.

I can't figure out why they chose the Rotax. Wouldn't an O-200 work well in
that plane?

I'll bet the FBO's would be more comfortable with a regular 'ole engine in
it, that they know and understand how to work on.
--
Jim in NC