Thread
:
Seeking opinion on Penn Yan SuperHawk O-360
View Single Post
#
4
August 9th 06, 01:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bill Zaleski
external usenet poster
Posts: 58
Seeking opinion on Penn Yan SuperHawk O-360
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:47:25 GMT,
(Zippity)
wrote:
Bill Zaleski wrote:
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:29:49 GMT,
(Zippity)
wrote:
Hi,
Our C172 O-320 is well over TBO and needs new cylinders. We are
thinking we might just bite the bullet and get a new engine at this
stage.
The Penn Yan Aero SuperHawk STC looks like a good option since it
would give us 180 HP - a nice extra safety margin for our short strip.
Has anyone here had any good or bad experience with this engine?
TIA for any info via post or email,
Z
I have had the Air Plains O-360 conversion in my 172N for 16 years
(3500 hours now). I am an A&P and IA. The Air Plains documentation
is much better, the installation is easier, and the product support is
great. It makes a poor man's 182 out of a 172, No complaints. Penn
Yan is right in my back yard, but I don't regret getting my STC from
the Kansas facility.
Thanks - I looked at Air Plains but it seems they just have a ship-out
kit to do the STC on an existing engine. I was looking at the factory
new engine option from Penn Yan. Do Air Plains have a similar scheme?
Our plane is N-reg but based in Europe.
I bought a factory new engine and did the installation myself with the
Air Plains STC and ship out kit. Air Plains provided the new engine.
Bill Zaleski
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Bill Zaleski
Find all threads started by Bill Zaleski