View Single Post
  #7  
Old August 13th 06, 06:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Roger[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 677
Default sferics vs Nexrad

Both strike finders and NEXTRAD have strong and weak points. The
strike finder is real time. Even at the weather station the newest
image is about 5 minutes old. The strike finder will not show you the
beginnings of convective activity while the RADAR *may*.

With time you learn to anticipate, or forecast using NEXTRAD but it
takes watching it for a while as well. If you know what it's been
doing, where it's going, and it's history along with moisture, laps
rate, and lifting index you can do well in predicting 5 to 10 minutes
ahead, but don't expect to pinpoint specifically what's going to be
happening where, when.

With study and experience the two together are fantastic and I wish I
had them in the Deb.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com