Clever anonymous handle.

Thanks, I choose to remain so at this time. Not so I can snipe or gripe, I
just prefer to do it this way. Heck, it's not like you're just the picture of
honesty and openness yourself. You wanna prang me about anonymity you really
oughta sign your posts yourself. Mturner ain't gonna get the mail delivered.
I've posted under my own name for years. And it was verifiable. And some on
this board have actually met me in person. Can you write the same?

You really are a spineless common loser
aren't you?

Whoa big boy! To quote John Belushi in the Blues Bros, "Well what did I do to
**** you off this time, baaaaby?" Do you read some threat or slight in my
asking a simple question? Which, by the way, I think your response answers.
But spineless? Me? Hehe, you don't know what you're writing. If anything I
push the envelope a little too hard at times. And no, I am not a loser, and by
no stretch of the imagination common. I just found it to be a humorous
anti-spam device. I actually tried common winner first, but there aren't
enough fields in the AOL spam block.

Probably didn't get enough cool-aid at the Jim Jones camp.
You can kiss my highly-traveled ass.

I'm just gonna assume that you woke up on the wrong side of the bed. Either
that or your anger management classes were cancelled and you were upset. :^)

I asked because you had referenced the Masons in one of your posts. I thought
I knew the answer to my question because you wrote of them as Free Masons. Not
to quibble, but it is Freemasons.

Since you did reference the Freemasons in the designing of the United States
Government, in particular the Separation of Church and State, I find it
interesting to point out that at no time has a man been allowed admission into
a Lodge of Freemasons if they did not profess belief in a Supreme Being. Same
for the early patriots. Atheists need not apply.