View Single Post
  #67  
Old November 19th 04, 03:15 AM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No, I am not agreeing to anything. I will state that I was the first to
introduce the words VFR-on-top into the thread, while quoting a section of
the AIM.

The AIM states that ATC will provide IFR/IFR separation. But, a VFR-on-fop
flight is an IFR flight, and ATC does not provide separation to VFR-on-top
aircraft. We were discussing IFR separation and this is a part of them, so
it is relevant to the thread.



"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...
[snip]

That's the section I posted. The third line down references VFR-on-top.


So, now you are agreeing that it was you that brought up VFR-on-top? As
irrelevant as it is to this thread, you are the person who introduced it.
By your own admission.