View Single Post
  #8  
Old September 19th 06, 01:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default ATP wants a single engine add on

The CLT multi-commercial should have been surrendered, do
they both have the same number and name. Have you checked
on the FAA web site for his official ratings?



"Emily" wrote in message
...
| Dave S wrote:
| My guess is that he is ex-mil... to account for the
resume you've
| listed.
|
| He is. Has never flown a single.
|
| It DOES sound weird tho.. You would think the ATP would
override
| the commercial multi CLT..
|
| That's what I thought. Granted, he *could* just be
carrying around the
| invalid commercial, assuming it's still valid. Not sure
what good it is.
|
| As for which one it adds on to: My guess is.. which ever
one he wants..
| He can train for a ASEL ride to private, commercial or
ATP standards
| provided he has the time in type for the add-on. (havent
looked at the
| applicable reg for this one as to any required hours).
|
| I'm trying to make it make sense by thinking of it how I
did it. I had
| a commercial single and just added the multi on. I
believe it's the
| same thing, no? He wouldn't have to go approaches, since
that's a
| commercial multi thing, but he'd had to add it at least at
the
| commercial or ATP level, because that's what he already
has.
|
| At least, as far as I can tell.