Quebec Tango wrote:
No Ramy, you just don't get it. You consistently argue that it is OK
to cheat if no one is watching. Why whould I ever want you in a game
with me? Your entire premise is wrong and unsportsmanlike.

Ramy wrote:
No Quebec Tango, this wasn't the point. The point is that Doug claims
that the sunset rule was not arbitrarily enforced, but the quotes he
provided do not mention any particular FAR. So my question remains:
When exactly was it decided which FAR to enforce and which not, and
when/where was it communicated?


Quebec Tango wrote:
Ramy,

The point is that you are responsible for self enforcing the FARS.
What secondary oversight any other organization engages in shpould be
irrevelent. If you are so focused on determining what is going to be
looked at (with the implication that that is all you have to bother
comply with), then you clearly need to be monitored closely.

Ramy wrote:
Doug, none of this mention any particular FAR. Since obviously you are
not enforcing all FARs, when exactly was it decided which FARs are to
be enforced?

Ramy

12/10/05

"Agenda Item 11 OLC Enforcement Procedure

Mr. Garner introduced a paper with a draft enforcement policy that
would supplement the
Federal Aviation Regulation Policy approved by the Board at its meeting
in October, 2005. The enforcement policy was then discussed at length,
the provisions of
which were generally agreed to. The committee asked that a
sub-committee of the Badge and Record Committee be established to
enforce this policy and to report to the Board of Directors on the
number of pilots that are sanctioned under the terms of this policy.
The policy will be mounted on the web site."

http://www.ssa.org/download/00-PostedMinutes12-10.pdf

"A posted flight that shows an FAR violation (such as entering Class A
airspace without a clearance or flying past sunset without lights) begs
for FAA action."

http://www.ssa.org/download/SSA%20Po...Violations.pdf

Are we done yet?