"Aluckyguess" wrote in message
...
Here is the revised page. There is probably a spelling error or something.
http://kevinandrews.com/for_sale_196...%20revised.htm

Quite a bit better... Personally, I wouldn't put the requirement for
Javascript on the page... At least you didn't use Macromedia Flash though...
That would be a quick way to alienate quite a few potential viewers...

You really should change the name of the file though... It's rather bad
style to put spaces in the file names... Some people put underscores, but
personally, I don't even like them -- I prefer hypens instead...

The large image files are useful when someone is wanting to see the image in
full detail... I would keep them, but have them as a hyperlink under each
image... They shouldn't be the image that one gets for clicking on the
thumbnail though... They are large files, so one should have to explicitly
click on some sort of "(full resolution image)" tag for them to come up...
For the thumbnails, I would go with somewhere around 320x200 or so, but with
high compression on the JPEG so that it doesn't take too much space...
Clicking on the thumbnail would result in another window coming up with an
image that would fit on an 800x600 display... Providing a hyperlink
underneath it for a full size image would also be nice and it could also
come up in another window... Basically, you're looking at three different
image files for each photo...