On 2006-10-13, wrote:
You've only argued that the type of aircraft was irrelevant at the
point of impact. I think we can all agree on that! But that dismisses
the possibility that this accident might not have happened if the
aircraft had been slower - like a C150.

True enough. But much of the original assertion was that the SR-20 is
the problem. If it was speed vs pilot reaction time - it's still not the
"fault" of the SR-20 or something that is disfavorable to the SR-20's
safety features. It could quite easily have been a Bonanza, a Mooney, a
Baron or a Van's RV-4.

--
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de