Defendario wrote:
Mike wrote:
Defendario wrote:
Mike wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:

Would the Commander of the Eisenhower task force obey an order to use
nukes without a long diplomatic buildup?
When did the US put nukes back on carriers???

Geez ...

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, I see.

OK dimwit; when did the US put tactical nukes back on her ships???


That could be so now. The navy has missiles that are nuke capable, as
well as aircraft. I can't think of a safer place to keep the stuff for
transportation to the AO. Can you?

"could be" -- LOL. Care you show _anything_ not from some net-based
loon such as yourself which says something other than "could be"?
Nope ...

Task Force comprises many vessels, not only CVN

But not SSBNs, dimwit.


Sure about that?

You _really_ think SSBNs are part of any carrier strike group?? LOL

What about the LA class attack subs?

They aren't SSBNs, now are they.

No Tomahawks
aboard those boats?

LOL; reading comprehension a problem? Tactical nuke warheads in the
first place, and second, any and all SSNs are under control of the
commander, carrier strike group??

So, where's the proof in the first place that the SSNs are carrying
today Tomahawks w/ nuclear warheads?

The question of whether the Commander will launch WW III without a
declaration is not sophomoric.

It sure as hell is. It's simply another silly comment, one of many in
this thread.


And I think you have gravitas...why?
snicker

double yawn

If Herr Bushler gives such an illegal
order, he should be arrested. I put my faith in a military junta before
I would the NeoCon cabal.

yawn


Go back to sleep, Kook. This convo is for adults only.

And you're no adult, dimwit.