gatt wrote:
Office-95 =/= Windows 95.

Nope... I run it on Win2K... I didn't like Win95... WinNT 3.1 was
acceptable one it had the Win95 looking interface, but when it still had
the old Windows 3x interface, it sucked...

I use a Linux system at work that won't run MS applications and found a
server downstairs that hadn't even been rebooted in five years. (!!!) It's
so old the admin team is afraid to reboot it because it might not start up.
But if you want to run FS-X, you're not going to be able to run it on
Office-95.

Yeah, UNIX is an entirely different beast -- it's reliable!!!

Most of the systems that I develop have a UNIX portion to them...
Usually, I have at least one Linux machine at home...

Really? That's definately a score. They'll probably be coming down
approaching Xma$, but that's less than half what they were selling for
earlier this year.

It was a special that Fry's had and I was over there looking for
something else and the price was too tempting... I use it on a machine
that I have configured to just store video that I capture off of
satellite... Eventually, I get around to moving the shows off to DVD...
At VCD resolution, that's over 600 hours of shows... Actually, come to
think of it, that HD is cheaper on a per GB basis than the actual DVDs
even though I get them for $0.19 each...