Recently, Thomas Borchert posted:

Newps,

Cue Mr. Borchert, main Cirrus apologist.


Just out of curiosity: What is the purpose of your post? To stifle
sensible discussion in this group even further? Have I at any point
raised unreasonable points that I was not able to substantiate by fact
about the Cirrus at any time? If so, please point them out to me.

This group is really going downhill fast, if differing opinions backed
up by facts are now considered to be a no-no.

This is not a new phenomenon around here, Thomas. We just seem to be
getting more sensitive to it, perhaps because of the greatly increased
traffic, one of the better outcomes of Mxsmanic's posts, IMO.

Neil