Thread
:
Starduster One pros and cons
View Single Post
#
2
October 29th 06, 05:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
Posts: 824
Starduster One pros and cons
In article om,
wrote:
Greetings,
I've been looking for an open cockpit biplane to have fun with (already
own and fly a 172) and was curious what opinions are about owning and
flying a Starduster One. Especially with an O-290G to D conversion. How
good or bad are their taildragger habits, what to expect from a
maintence standpoint (any problems to be aware of), problems with the
O-290, etc.
I just got my taildragger endorsement (in a Cub and Cessna140), so I'm
leery about getting something too hot to handle, part of the point is
to build up taildragger experience for the future (when I buy my
Nieuport or Fokker replica!)
Thanks for any opinions.
Ryan
The O-290s use the same top end as the O-435 straight valve engines. As
such, nobody makes replacement cylinders; valves, pistons, rods and
bearings are still available.
As a first-generation (wartime manufacture) engine, the heads tend to
crack more than contemporary engines, so you can look forward to
replacing some cylinders.
Orval Fairbairn
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Orval Fairbairn
Find all threads started by Orval Fairbairn