"Morgans" wrote in message
...
[...]
Your last two pronouncments (including this one) are easily disproved
simply by looking at what those posters actually post.

Last two?

If you are talking about MX, you would have to prove me wrong. You
couldn't
do it.

No...Mxsmanic is clearly a troll, in spite of a handful of other people
defending him as otherwise.

I'm referring to your reply to another poster, whose name I've forgotten.
Starts with a "T" I think. If I recall, their post came up in the context
of hangar doors? Or maybe it was just around the same time that thread was
here. I don't recall.

This one, I guess it is guilt by association with and support of troll
number 1. Perhaps it is wrong, so I'll wait and see.

There is no way you could legitimately call the person posting as
"Xmnushal8y" a troll. If you'd look at any of the articles posted
previously, that would be apparent. She goes some time between posts
occasionally, but isn't anything like a troll.

Frankly, we're actually relatively lucky. As disruptive as "Mxsmanic" has
been, he's really the only active troll around here these days. Not all
newsgroups are so lucky, nor has r.a.piloting been so lucky in days past
(recalling people like Mulcahy, Zoom, Eagleson, AcroCFI, etc....we've had
our share of nutcases, and just as they all eventually faded away, so too
will "Mxsmanic")

Pete