"Larry Dighera" wrote in message


So you're defining "MAP" as "missed MTR entry approach procedure"?

Hey, you're catching on. :-)

It's hard when you're making up terms on the fly.

What is the proper procedure if the pilot fails to locate the MTR
entry point? Do you know? Is it published?

Others have answered that question, but VMC prevailed and they were
operating VFR. I expect normal VFR to apply.

Any thinking person can easily understand, that if he needed a
clearance to descend into Class B airspace, canceling IFR would not
remove that requirement. It's just logical.

It's just as logical that if one believes he is not entering the airspace he
would not need a clearance.

I asked you not to try to defend Parker's decision to descend, without
plotting out the aircraft positions on a chart, but you chose to
ignore my request.

That's a bold statement. Do you *know* I didn't?

Actually, all three pilots involved in this MAC were flight
instructors.

Check your facts.

Re-read the AIB report, or you not truly interested enough in this
subject to perform the work necessary to discuss it intelligently? I'm
done doing your research for you.

I did re-read the AIB you posted (before posting my response). Your
assertion is incorrect. Check your facts.

Do you have any information that substantiates your
allegation of his willingness to place himself in harm's way?

Yes. He was piloting an F-16 while serving in the US Air Force.

Rather, I desire to expose what appears to me as a military cover
up...[snip]

This appears to be the basis of your participation in this entire thread. I
admit a predisposition to give the highly trained professionals in the cadre
of military pilots the benefit of the doubt. You, on the other hand, appear
predisposed to the opposite. Further discussion on this is pointless -
despite your pathetic attempt to take the high road in your other response.

--
John T
http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer
Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://openspf.org
____________________