View Single Post
  #9  
Old January 13th 07, 03:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
rustynuts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default Non-Owners insurance- Worthless?

Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
Looks like paragraph f) prohibits it, but I know for a fact it is
happening. Interesting. So then what happens in the event of an
accident in an experimental rental? Lawsuit? Or worse, your insurance
that claims to cover experimental then denies coverage based on
91.319f. They would still be on the hook for "borrowed" experimental
aircraft I expect.

Any lawyers out there have an opinion?


Vaughn Simon wrote:

Under what conditions can you rent an experimental glider? Doesn't 91.319
prohibit that?

Vaughn


1) Experimental A/C are supposed to have the word Experimental in a
conspicues (sp) place on the A/C.
2) It's up to the PIC to determine that the A/C is in airworthy
condition ie. ARROW. This goes as far as for you to check the A/C log
to see if the annual or 100 hour inspection has been performed as
required per FAR's.
3) You won't find very many if any 2 place rental ships in the
Experimental catagory on the flight line for rent.

How bout it CB ?