View Single Post
  #10  
Old January 26th 07, 09:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 42
Default Chicago Seminar Feb 24 Piggott, Striedieck, Good, Carswell, Lewis, Cochrane

Stupid? You got a choice of eating some undercooked rabbit by Iris and
sit on Karl hand looking at and listening to Karl beg for advice OR
flying off somewhere chasing naked girliebirds eating fresh kill
dripping in blood. I think Karl got out-hawked.

On Jan 26, 10:06*am, "Brian Glick" wrote:
I just talked to KS and ask him to bring this year's hawk over to my farm
for a hunt. He told me he could not, as he just released his hawk for this
year. He told me it was set free for a "low IQ" He said it was the dumbest
bird he had ever seen. Hmmmm, glad to see that birds can suffer from human
aspects as well......LOL

Brian Glick

wrote in ooglegroups.com...



On Jan 18, 10:52 am, "Herb" wrote:
Now if Karl WOULD bring a hawk on the flight to Chicago and if the hawk
WOULD decide to spend time flying up and down the aisle - would the ac
then consume less fuel due to the reduced weight?
My answer is of course NO since the fuselage is a closed and static
system (although there is obviously an air exchange) and as such the
total mass would not change. *Any other opinions?


Herb, J7


Well, any sensible hawk would fly up to first class for better food.
Then, passengers would run aft, thereby decreasing trim drag.
So, less fuel consumption but possibly an interesting landing ?
See ya, Dave- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -