Hoo boy - if you gents are trying to get Kraus sued for libel, in my
opinion you are using excellent tactics by attacking Trask and getting his
temper up. As I read it, Kraus unequivocally stated Trask committed several
crimes ("he broke a few FAR's"). It is my understanding that while personal
insults are generally deemed opinion and therefore not libelous, making
false factual claims with the intent to damage a person's reputation is
libel.

Perhaps if Kraus makes a public retraction and/or apology then this can be
settled and the lawyers will have to find some other way to make their
mortgage payments.