Thread
:
False glideslopes -- NZ60
View Single Post
#
9
February 1st 07, 05:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,326
False glideslopes -- NZ60
wrote:
On Jan 31, 2:59 am, Sam Spade wrote:
In that case the P-FAF was moved to be coincident with the non-precision
FAF, if I recall correctly.
Why is that important? I guess its easy to do if you're using DME
fixes, but why do that if you're not going to decommission the outer
marker?
It is a current FAA policy. If I ever heard the reason, I don't recall
it now. I do know the tower chief at Oakland got upset over the change,
but national policy ruled.
Sam Spade
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Sam Spade
Find all threads started by Sam Spade