Cub Driver wrote:


That certainly makes a lot of sense...it would seem that there's
lots less problems to contend with down low.

You're joking, right? (Irony is not a safe weapon on the internet. We
can't hear the tone of your voice!)

If it's safer down below, why did the B-17s and B-24s (not to mention
the B-29s) go to all that effort to fly at 25,000 and 30,000 feet?


C'mon Dan, Art sed it's safer, you really think that any regular
poster on here would dare to naysay him?...haven't tried it have
you?...
--

-Gord.